Trying
to Keep Up February
25, 2008
I
get a lot of questions: How strong is this
or that? What if I used this kind of knot here,
how much weaker is it? Does a biner lose strength
if I drop it? Is my cam still ok after taking
a monster whipper? When should I retire my
ropes? Etc, etc…
But
the most common question I get by far is: “KP,
how do you keep up with your sick strong rope-gun
wife?”
The
answer is plain and simple. I don’t…because
I can’t.
And
this is what happens:



Shoulder
surgery and out for six months.
Not
good.
Bottom
line...
KP
can’t hang with his strong wife, but
it’s okay… I’m used to it.

Extending
a Cam Sling: Sling on Sling May
21, 2007
Now
this is just me—when I rack for a multipitch
trad climb, I rack like this:
- Cams
(with a biner on each cam), set of stoppers
on my harness
- Quickdraws
and a few spare biners on my harness
- Over-the-shoulder
runners with one biner on each—over my
shoulder (well duh...)
If
I need to place a cam, I grab one, place it,
clip it and go.

If
I need to place a cam and extend the sling, I
place a cam—then either use one of my quickdraws
and clip through the sling like this:

Or
grab a shoulder sling and extend all the way
like this:

Not
rocket science.
FYI:
if I place a stopper I either use a quickdraw,
a shoulder sling with the biner that’s
on it PLUS a spare biner, or a quickdraw AND
a shoulder sling for extra length.
So
a while ago when I was down in the desert climbing
a tower with a buddy, and I came up to several
cam placements like this—I was confused.

I
saw him fiddling at all of these cam placements
and was wondering what in the world was going
on up there—he’s taking forever farting
around with gear—maybe it’s because
he’s so strong he doesn’t get it—but
for me, I need to place the piece and keep moving
before I flame out. So as I’m seconding
his pitches and having to deal with this unfamiliar
conglomeration of slings on slings on cams, etc—I’m
wondering:
- Why
is he doing this? and
- How
much does this affect the strength?
- And,
I am getting pumped out of my mind.
I
mean nylon on nylon or Spectra on Spectra, etc—sounds
like bad juju to me—and I’m not talking
about girth hitching anything here—just
looping it through…
I
get to the belay and ask my partner what’s
up with the method—and then it all clicks—ahhhh "old
school alpinist," light is right, save a
biner, etc, etc—and old habits are hard
to break. Regardless—I got
back from the weekend, explained the situation
to the crew in the QA lab and we proceeded to
do a few quick tests.
The
Tests
We
slung some 8 mm Spectra through a typical cam
sling and did a few pulls in the tensile tester
and a few drops in the drop tower. We compared
the results to a cam sling only.

Here
are the results:
Tensile
Tests:
15.6
kN
16.2
kN
15.5
kN
Average:
15.8 kN
Actual
historical average for cam sling ONLY: 25.5 kN
Therefore
sling on sling method provided results 61.8%
of historical average—or another way to
look at it, it reduced
the strength of the cam sling by almost 40%.
Drop
Tests (note: these are NOT UIAA drop tests)
In
both test configurations (i.e. cam sling only,
and cam sling threaded with 8 mm spectra), the
rope broke after over six successive factor two
drops (80 kg mass) with peak loads of over 10
kN. The cam sling, or sling on sling method
was NEVER the failure mode in drop test scenarios.
Conclusions
The
sling on sling method of extending a cam sling
does save the use of a biner but in my opinion
is cumbersome for both the leader and the second.
It also appears to reduce the ultimate strength
of the system, however, in most cases not so
much as to be the weakest link in a real-world
climbing situation.
Bottom
Line
When
you’re extending a cam sling, use a biner
and make everyone’s life a bit easier.
If you’re a super light-and-fast type of
guy, the sling-on-sling method works, but know
that it does weaken the system. Also note that
none of the tests we performed took into account
possible wearing from rubbing and friction—possibly
even reducing the overall strength of the connection
even more.
Climb
Safe,
KP

March
9, 2007—Girth Hitching a Stopper
A
buddy of mine emailed me the other day—he
was out at a crag and saw someone girth hitch
a #4 stopper to a bolt hanger, then clip a biner
to the end, clip his rope and continue on. Hmmmm??
Maybe short a biner? Not sure. Regardless—he
asked if I could do a quick test just out of
curiosity to see how strong it would be.
We
did a few pulls in the tensile tester. Note:
Due to the way the particular bolt hanger we
used was stamped, one edge was slightly rounded,
whereas the other was definitely more sharp (see
photo)—therefore we girth hitched the stopper
both ways, getting data with the load bearing
strands on the rounded edge AND on the sharper
edge. (see photos)
We
tested three samples in each configuration. Here
is a summary of the results:
Tensile
Tests
|
Test
configuration
|
Average
|
|
Load
strands over rounded edge
|
1845
lbf (8.2 kN)
|
|
Load
strands over sharp edge
|
1270
lbf (5.6 kN)
|
Note:
Just for reference—a #4 Stopper is rated
to 6 kN (1349 lbf); and a quickdraw typically
is rated to 22 kN.
Drop
Tests
We
decided to perform similar tests (i.e. load strands
over the rounded edge and load strands over the
sharp edge) but in a dynamic (i.e. drop) scenario.
The results were very similar:
|
Test
configuration
|
Value
at Failure
|
|
Load
strands over rounded edge
|
1755
lbf (7.8 kN)
|
|
Load
strands over sharp edge
|
1424
lbf (6.3 kN)
|
Observations & Conclusions
- The
way the stopper wire was threaded had a significant
impact on the ultimate strength of the system
(variation of approx. 30%).
- Similar
results were found in tensile tests and dynamic
tests.
- Significantly
weaker than if a proper quickdraw was used
(approx 30% of “full strength” (i.e.
22 kN).
- Girth
hitching a stopper to a bolt hanger results
in a system strength such that the loads at
which these set-ups will fail are within the
loads that can be seen in real climbing situations
in the field.
- It
most definitely is possible that if the climber
in question here had whipped onto that bolt,
the stopper wire could have cut and he/she
would have plummeted to the next piece.
Bottom
Line
Sometimes
if you’re in a situation, you do whatever
it takes—because sometimes “something
is better than nothing.” I’ve used
my gear sling to girth a shrub, clipped my ice
tool and left it there as my last piece as I’ve
topped out, stuffed a knotted sling and even
a carabiner into a crack as a stopper as well
as a host of other not-so-smart-but-in-times-of-desperation-perhaps-better-than-nothing
things. I’ve heard of guys rapping off
of boot laces, using tent poles as a dead-man
to rap off of and even jamming a camera lens
in a crack using it as a chockstone to bail off
a route. The reality is that sometimes you do
what you need to—but in most cases this
is not necessary, and gear should be used as
it is intended, otherwise the strength, and ultimately
your safety, can be compromised.
Use
carabiners when clipping to a bolt, or between
a cam, piton or stoppers and slings. Clip your
rope through a carabiner, never through a runner.
Don’t girth hitch stoppers to bolts, slings
to bolts, slings to stoppers, or even slings
to slings, etc. Understand how to properly use
your gear, read the instructions and seek instruction
from a qualified guide if you are unsure.
Climb
safe out there,
KP
January
19, 2007—Retiring Old Ropes
We’ve
all seen it at the cliffs, and I’m a major
offender myself—climbing on old ratty ropes.
Yeah, ropes are expensive and that’s the
main reason people push their ropes to the limit—trying
to squeeze every last ounce of use out of them
until they become a dog leash or door mat. I’m
not going to lie—I get sweet deals on cords,
but still, I don’t like to be wasteful
and usually end up climbing on my ropes a little
too long.
Ropes
can develop a sentimental value to some people—maybe
it’s the cord you sent the “proj” with,
or had a great trip up a Valley wall with—so
you just don’t want to retire it. I had
such a case—a special 9.4mm. I kept climbing
and climbing and climbing on it. It was beat.
It started out as a 70 m, then after endless
days of constant whippers, it became a 65 m,
then 60 m, then 55 m. I just didn’t want
to see it go.
So
one weekend I was taking REPEATED MONSTER whippers
off the VERY LAST move of one of the many nemesis
routes of mine. I had to skip the last clip
because I’m too weak to clip it—and
go for a huge chuck to the finishing bucket.
I would sail onto the end of my trusty 9.4 mm
time and time again. The last 10 ft or so of
the cord were absolutely throttled—at the
end of that weekend, it was time to say goodbye.
Of
course, I brought it into the lab and figured
I’d do some testing.
Testing
I
decided just to test the ultimate tensile strength
of the rope in different areas, and compare it
to a brand new rope of the same model and make. We
didn’t do anything fancy—just a figure
8 on each end, and pulled to failure in the tensile
tester. We were just doing this quick and dirty
for comparison's and curiosity's sake.
When
tested like this, breakage at the knot is almost
always the failure mode—and remember—figure
eight knots can reduce the strength of a rope
somewhere in the neighborhood of 25-30%.
Results
The
first test we did was a piece from one of the
totally worn-out ends. It broke at around 6 kN—and
NOT at the knot.
Yowsa,
I had just been whipping all over the place on
that cord—and it broke at 6 kN, and NOT
at the knot—scary stuff. Though the sporto
falls I was taking were super soft (my wife was
belaying and is light, and I am fat)—chances
are the tension seen in the rope wasn’t
anywhere near 6 kN, but if I had gotten slammed
hard, low to the ground, etc??? It’s definitely
possible to see these kinds of loads in the field.
We
decided to do more tests on my cord—on
the ends, and in the middle, as well as on a
brand new 9.4 mm for comparison purposes. In
all subsequent tests, the sample broke at the
knot as expected, but we still saw some frighteningly
low values.
|
New
9.4 mm
|
KP’s
9.4 mm
middle
|
KP’s
9.4 mm
end
|
|
15.6
kN
|
9
kN
|
6
kN*
|
|
13.8
kN
|
9.8
kN
|
8
kN
|
|
|
|
7.7
kN
|
*broke
in the middle of the test sample
We
tracked down another beat 9.4 mm from one of
the QA guys—and put it through the ringer
as well:
|
New
9.4 mm
|
Used
9.4 mm
middle
|
Used
9.4 mm
end
|
|
12.9
kN
|
11.9
kN
|
8
kN
|
|
13.6
kN
|
11.9
kN
|
9.8
kN
|
|
|
11.6
kN
|
8.6
kN
|
Still
curious and given the results we’d seen—the
boys in the lab and I decided to do the same
with some other tattered ropes that were around. We
did similar tests with more Beal ropes as well
as Sterling, Edelweiss, Mammut, etc. We
found very similar results:
- The
worn out, frayed, end pieces of any rope we
tested were consistently significantly weaker
than the middle sections of the same cord.
- We
DID manage to find other samples that broke
in the middle (as opposed to at the knot) – and
at relatively low loads—less than 7kN.
- The
end pieces, and middle pieces were consistently
weaker than a section of a brand new cord.
Bottom
Line
- Ropes,
like all climbing gear, don’t last forever—the
ends of your rope take a beating—be wary
of super frayed, worn, puffed out, beat up
tattered cords. Yes, ropes aren’t cheap,
but they’re also your lifeline—literally—so
take care of them.
- When
the ends of your cord get all beat and tattered
from dogging up routes, cut the ends off, or
a buy a new rope.
- I
always cut equal lengths off BOTH ends so
the middle mark is always in the middle.
- Be
sure to mark the new length on BOTH ends
so you and your partners know what you’re
dealing with.
- And
while you’re at it—tie a knot
in one end—too often you hear of someone
being lowered off the end of their rope—definitely
not cool.
- For
me the most important thing… to train
harder and get stronger, so I won’t be
whipping in the first place.
Be
careful out there,
KP

December
18, 2006 “Is my rope still OK to use
if I accidentally peed on it?”
It’s
almost disturbing how many emails I get with
the almost identical: “Uhhh, hmmmm, I kinda
peed on my rope, do you think it’s still
ok?,” or “A dog peed on my rope at
the crag, should I retire it?,” or “My
girlfriend peed on my rope, is it still ok to
use?”
I
hate to sound like a broken record, but when
this sort of thing happens, no one can be exactly
sure what effect it had on your rope or equipment.
I always have to play the conservative card and
say, “If in doubt, retire it.”
Other
than wondering what actually is going on out
in the field with all of these people peeing
on each other’s ropes, I wondered what
kind of affect does it really have. No, I didn’t
go pee on a rope of mine and test it, but as "luck" would
have it, I got an email from a person something
to the effect of:
“My
cat peed on my brand new 9.1 mm, it sat there
for over a week, when I got home to discover
this I washed it several times in baking soda
to get rid of the smell, and I have two questions
for you:
- Is
the rope ok to use?
- What
kind of hat should I make out of my cat? Note:
he really did ask this…
I
had the guy send the now non-stinky rope in and
we performed some tests on it.
So
again, of course, by no means are these experiments
conclusive—just some interesting information
if you happen to have a cat pee on your brand
new rope and then wash it in baking soda three
times.
The
Tests
We
performed all tests on the ‘Cat Pee’ rope
alongside a baseline test of a brand new 9.1
mm of the same brand—so that we could compare
relative results.
Static
Tensile Tests
- Full
Strength—Pulled five samples of each
rope in tension in the tensile test machine—ropes
wrapped around drum jigs to force the failure
mode to the single strand.
- Strength
over a Carabiner—Pulled two samples of
each rope in tension in the tensile test machine—over
a carabiner—using figure 8 knots on each
end.
Drop
Tower Tests (note: these tests are not in
any way even close to the UIAA drop test)
- 4
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots in each
end—factor 1.35 fall—over a carabiner
- 8
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots on each
end—factor 1.2 fall—over a carabiner
- 4
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots on each
end—factor 2 fall—direct onto anchor
- 8
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots on each
end—factor 2 fall—direct onto anchor
The
Results
Tensile
Tests
In
all cases the failure mode was the rope breaking
at the fixture. So this isn’t a totally
accurate test as the desired mode would be the
sample breaking in the middle, however, for our
purposes it does give us a relative comparison
to some extent.
- Full
Strength Test—The ‘Cat Pee’ rope
averaged approximated 94% of full strength
of a brand new rope.
|
~Full
Strength
|
|
Joker
9.1
|
Joker
w/ Cat Pee
|
|
Strength
(lbf)
|
|
Strength
(lbf)
|
|
1
|
4739
|
1
|
4329
|
|
2
|
4361
|
2
|
4058
|
|
3
|
4547
|
3
|
4362
|
|
4
|
4421
|
4
|
4373
|
|
5
|
4671
|
5
|
4295
|
|
|
6
|
4285
|
|
avg.
|
4547.8
|
avg.
|
4283.7
|
|
%
full
|
100
|
%
full
|
94.2
|
- Over
a carabiner—The ‘Cat Pee’ rope
averaged approximately 95% of the strength
of the brand new rope.
|
Strength
Over Carabiner
|
|
Joker
9.1
|
Joker
w/ Cat Pee
|
|
Strength
(lbf)
|
|
Strength
(lbf)
|
|
1
|
6406
|
1
|
6014
|
|
2
|
6324
|
2
|
6081
|
|
avg.
|
6365.0
|
avg.
|
6047.5
|
|
%
full
|
100
|
%
full
|
95.0
|
Drop
Tower Tests
- 4
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots in each
end—factor 1.35 fall—over a carabiner.
|
New
Joker 9.1 mm
|
“Cat
Pee 9.1 mm”
|
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
|
14
|
3968
|
9
|
3982
|
|
Factor
~ 1.35 over a BD Airlock2
|
|
Joker
9.1
|
Joker
w/ Cat Pee
|
|
Drop
|
Max
Force (lbf)
|
Drop
|
Max
Force (lbf)
|
|
1
|
1411
|
1
|
1680
|
|
2
|
2264
|
2
|
2402
|
|
3
|
2699
|
3
|
2972
|
|
4
|
2968
|
4
|
3265
|
|
5
|
3189
|
5
|
3446
|
|
6
|
3336
|
6
|
3681
|
|
7
|
3458
|
7
|
3748
|
|
8
|
3572
|
8
|
3895
|
|
9
|
3570
|
9
|
3982
|
|
10
|
3698
|
10
|
3239
X
|
|
11
|
3765
|
|
|
|
12
|
3870
|
|
|
|
13
|
3912
|
|
|
|
14
|
3968
|
|
|
|
15
|
3470
X
|
|
|
- 8
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots on each
end—factor 1.2 fall—over a carabiner.
|
New
Joker 9.1 mm
|
“Cat
Pee 9.1 mm”
|
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
|
6
|
4148
|
5
|
4045
|
|
Factor
~ 1.2 over a Omega Steel
|
|
Joker
9.1
|
Joker
w/ Cat Pee
|
|
Drop
|
Max
Force (lbf)
|
Drop
|
Max
Force (lbf)
|
|
1
|
2189
|
1
|
2279
|
|
2
|
3007
|
2
|
3081
|
|
3
|
3465
|
3
|
3536
|
|
4
|
3763
|
4
|
3878
|
|
5
|
3979
|
5
|
4045
|
|
6
|
4148
|
6
|
3592
X
|
|
7
|
4029
X
|
|
|
- 4
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots on each
end—factor 2 fall—direct onto anchor.
|
New
Joker 9.1 mm
|
“Cat
Pee 9.1 mm”
|
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
|
5
|
2759
|
3
|
2357
|
|
Factor
~ 2 w/ Figure 8 in Both Ends
|
|
Joker
9.1
|
Joker
w/ Cat Pee
|
|
Drop
|
Max
Force (lbf)
|
Drop
|
Max
Force (lbf)
|
|
1
|
1248
|
1
|
1364
|
|
2
|
1891
|
2
|
2041
|
|
3
|
2260
|
3
|
2357
|
|
4
|
2488
|
4
|
No
Drop X
|
|
5
|
2759
|
|
|
|
6
|
2316
X
|
|
|
- 8
ft length of rope—figure 8 knots on each
end—factor 2 fall—direct onto anchor.
|
New
Joker 9.1 mm
|
“Cat
Pee 9.1 mm”
|
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
#
Falls Held
|
Max
Load Seen
|
|
3
|
2583
|
2
|
|